TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-17C5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star GE73 Raider RGB 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-17C5  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime18.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '20 at 14:51
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 198
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 511
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 73.7%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1215) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5148
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 73
Parallax 61.9
56% 68.1 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 66.1
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 55.6%
 Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 319 323 323 319 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,652
Write 1,004
Mixed 702
SusWrite 346
205% 926 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 63.6
208% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 958
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 828
624% 839 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑
This bench: 190%
 Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
677GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 114 120 119 120 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 95.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 118
67% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 71.5%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 20.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 69.9%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-17C5 Builds (Compare 1,454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C5

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples1,449x
Xeon E-2176MIntelBench 77%, 4,000 samples3x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples2x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples656x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples461x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples333x
SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples229x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GBWDCBench 139%, 2,393 samples119x
RBUSNS8180S3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,961 samples54x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples309x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples89x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples87x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback