Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.2
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 14:35
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 804
79% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2975 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 114
Parallax 109
82% 108 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 89.1
Splatting 83.8
77% 96.3 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,055
Write 2,100
Mixed 1,004
382% 1,720 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 76.6
256% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 1,027
750% 978 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 261%
WD TS54505 External 500GB
32GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 26 26 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 30.2
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 27.9
40% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 29.6
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 29
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.2 Builds (Compare 536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback