HP AiO 22-3130xtb DT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP AiO 22-3130xtb DT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B3C
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 03:33
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 144
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 236
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 A330
HP(103C 2B3C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1501.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 4.66
3% 5.59 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.52
5% 5.38 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 81 87 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 89.6
Write 104
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 82.4
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 69%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 83 83 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 86.8
Write 80.5
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 82.1
105% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.8
246% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AiO 22-3130xtb DT PC Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP AiO 22-3130xtb DT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback