Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 19:52
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$73
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 220
68% 127 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 444
59% 443 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 21.5
14% 18.5 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 21.2
14% 17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 107 88 86 85 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 392
Write 134
Mixed 174
SusWrite 97.7
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 32.8
128% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 132
107% 153 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 80%
I-O DATA HDPD-AUT 995GB
174GB free
Firmware: 0100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 0.5 0 0.9 1.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 94.3
Write 67.8
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 0.9
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
0GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.4
Write 6.7
Mixed 12.4
18% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.3
144% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 24
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $302
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback