Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '20 at 07:50
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Memory 69.1 1-Core 149 2-Core 291 90% 170 Pts	4-Core 557 8-Core 836 86% 696 Pts	64-Core 1045 65% 1045 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58% Above average	Lighting 72.5 Reflection 71.3 Parallax 99.8 59% 81.2 fps	MRender 71.9 Gravity 72.6 Splatting 62.7 56% 69 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2202 584 582 586 584 585 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	292% Outstanding	Read 2,512 Write 2,214 Mixed 1,610 SusWrite 854 401% 1,797 MB/s	4K Read 61.9 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 85 281% 98.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,259 DQ Write 1,061 DQ Mixed 1,150 864% 1,157 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 292% Great: 340%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 6GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 99 93 94 93 89 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 80.5 Write 79.7 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 92.2 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 70%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 5GB free Firmware: CC94 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 52 49 51 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 46.5 Write 14.8 Mixed 30 SusWrite 50.1 26% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 56%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 194GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 79 80 79 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 89 Write 86.7 Mixed 47 SusWrite 80.8 56% 75.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 54%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 125GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 80 80 79 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 54.3 Write 55.5 Mixed 40 SusWrite 79.1 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion 320GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 244GB free Firmware: 060E SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 14 15 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.23% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 14 Mixed 7 SusWrite 14.4 9% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 8.23% Great: 50%
ASMT 2105 4TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1GB free, PID 5136 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.7 Write 22.8 Mixed 16.7 25% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB 13,978 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.3% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 26.1 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 23.8 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	835x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,032

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16