Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '20 at 11:42
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 89.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 791
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,871
116% 1,871 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 95.6
56% 76.6 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 55.8
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 887 481 471 474 478 479 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
12GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 99 101 93 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 82.2
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 98.9
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 66%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
95GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 122 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 101
Write 91.2
Mixed 88
SusWrite 122
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
11GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 94 91 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 84.5
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 87.2
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 141 146 144 147 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
ST375064 0AS 750GB
157GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 48 41 53 58 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 46
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 52.6
63% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 25%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B0 640GB
3GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 75
Write 75.8
Mixed 56.3
87% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 39%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
63GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.4 3.2 5.3 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 98.7
Write 97.3
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 1.8
70% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 43%
SD Card 256GB
161GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 88.2
Write 80.5
Mixed 43
SusWrite 83
98% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.4
253% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 43%
WDC WD15 EARS-00S8B1 1.5TB
83GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 48 41 51 53 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 87
Write 97.5
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 51.1
85% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
17% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 28%
WDC WD10 EARS-00MVWB0 1TB
7GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 29
Write 26
Mixed 23
SusWrite 26.4
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 33.9
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 31.9
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,880
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback