Acer Aspire XC-605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-605
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 13:32
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 234
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 584
65% 509 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 74.7
45% 65.2 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 55.9
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$59
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 46 149 133 129 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 408
Write 340
Mixed 278
SusWrite 147
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 15.8
68% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 44.3
49% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 55%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB
931GB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 110 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 99.5
Write 101
Mixed 36
SusWrite 109
116% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 43%
SEMC SD CCR-80 64GB
59GB free, PID e134
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.5 9.3 9.6 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 9.2
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 9.9
15% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-605 Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback