Asus BM6660(BM6360)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus BM6660(BM6360)  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM6660(BM6360)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 03:14
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 152
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 299
36% 278 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
MSI(1462 2808) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 16
Parallax 21.2
14% 18.1 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 15.2
15% 19.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 64GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 117 104 103 112 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.2% Above average
Read 283
Write 122
Mixed 151
SusWrite 105
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 17.5
94% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 88.1
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 119
87% 112 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
328GB free
Firmware: 01.01S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 119 114 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 126
Write 108
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 116
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1333 Team--Elite-1333 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM6660(BM6360) Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Asus BM6660(BM6360)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback