Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DAP_F412DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DAP_F412DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412DAP
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 01:49
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 155
50% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 250
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1082) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 8.22
5% 7.8 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9
6% 6.56 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 437 194 184 186 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,153
Write 888
Mixed 872
SusWrite 333
181% 812 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 41
150% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 545
416% 554 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 137%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DAP_F412DA Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DAP_F412DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback