Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DAP_F412DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DAP_F412DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412DAP
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 04:27
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 172
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 287
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1082) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 8.28
5% 8.08 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.04
6% 6.64 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 510 146 200 178 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,187
Write 948
Mixed 897
SusWrite 340
188% 843 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.7
195% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 567
DQ Mixed 545
405% 531 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 152%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DAP_F412DA Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DAP_F412DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback