Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 14:41
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 329
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 30
Parallax 36.7
32% 35.2 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 35.2
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 12 21 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.17% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 35.8
Mixed 16
SusWrite 14
14% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 7.17%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST1000VX001-1HH162 1TB
62GB free
Firmware: DA11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 130 158 158 159 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 142
Write 156
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 150
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 99%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
5GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 27.6
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 50%
ASMT 2105 500GB
66GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 27.3
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 27.7
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $192
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback