Casper EXCALIBUR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER EXCALIBUR
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170206
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 20:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 151
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 305
37% 282 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Quanta(152D 1163) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 29.7
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 24.8
24% 25.5 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 20.2
22% 27.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 54 53 50 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 371
Write 50.5
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 52.6
30% 141 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 16.9
62% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 18.4
DQ Mixed 40.8
43% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
803GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 97 99 100 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 96
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 98.8
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8213.C8FBD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback