Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 00:06
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,109
102% 850 Pts
64-Core 1,173
73% 1,173 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 170
Parallax 180
143% 175 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 153
Splatting 111
116% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 397 445 421 437 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 469
Mixed 441
SusWrite 406
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 54.4
183% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$142
601GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1600 2344 1331 1126 1128 1133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2483
Write 1,910
Mixed 1,307
SusWrite 1,444
399% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 79.8
265% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,973
DQ Write 1,272
DQ Mixed 1525
1,164% 1,590 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 342%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 194 195 194 194 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 149
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 192
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Toshiba External USB HDD 500GB
65GB free, PID a003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 21 20 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 31
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 21.2
36% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
WD My Passport 071A 750GB
698GB free, PID 071a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 32.7
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 21.6
38% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 18%
ASMT 2115 120GB
76GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 52 52 51 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
22% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 36.3
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 51.6
56% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 22%
Great: 185%
ASMT 2115 120GB
111GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 53 53 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 38.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 52.1
59% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 162%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 32
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 45.1
SC Mixed 31.2
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback