Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H310M A 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '20 at 12:33
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 249 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 657 73% 574 Pts	64-Core 691 43% 691 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2649 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.4% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 144 Parallax 123 94% 127 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 124 Splatting 104 93% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 174 171 189 174 200 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 322 Write 119 Mixed 288 SusWrite 175 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 79.6 4K Mixed 37 142% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 8.5 54% 128 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 98%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 99GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 336 331 331 331 330 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 371 Write 384 Mixed 366 SusWrite 337 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 28.4 92% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 35.3 62% 121 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GB 2,668 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.4% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 23.3 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 21.7 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 59.3 67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	201x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	80x
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	43x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	41x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	12x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $386

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16