Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H310M A 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '20 at 23:58
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 122 2-Core 250 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 629 71% 555 Pts	64-Core 742 46% 742 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 130 Reflection 144 Parallax 125 106% 133 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 124 Splatting 108 93% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 314 88 98 96 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 404 Write 378 Mixed 285 SusWrite 166 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 27 115% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 200 171% 250 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 98%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 68GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 329 320 331 328 323 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 395 Write 406 Mixed 361 SusWrite 333 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 25.4 85% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 34 61% 121 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GB 2,668 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	84.9% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 23.8 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 23.9 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	201x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	80x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	43x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	41x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16