Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H310M A 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '20 at 04:48
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 126 2-Core 253 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 621 70% 549 Pts	64-Core 722 45% 722 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 143 Parallax 126 108% 134 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 128 Splatting 105 94% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 357GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 400 232 73 105 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 436 Write 187 Mixed 332 SusWrite 207 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 38 142% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 196 170% 250 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 98%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 92GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 330 326 328 317 317 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 391 Write 397 Mixed 369 SusWrite 326 84% 371 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 23.7 79% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 176 129% 169 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GB 2,668 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 24.7 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 22.4 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 58.4 68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	201x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	80x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	43x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	41x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16