Acer Aspire E1-522

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-522  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E1-522
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 10:55
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2500 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Memory 32.6
1-Core 21.5
2-Core 39.9
20% 31.3 Pts
4-Core 43.1
8-Core 41.1
6% 42.1 Pts
64-Core 42.1
3% 42.1 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
Acer(1025 076B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 1.12
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.26
2% 1.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 211 94 88 84 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 252
Write 302
Mixed 258
SusWrite 141
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
17% 5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF ACR16D3LS1NBG/4G 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.36% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.36%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-522 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-522

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback