Asrock H370 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H370 Performance  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 10:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 267
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,031
95% 793 Pts
64-Core 1,511
94% 1,511 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59% Above average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 0.08
Parallax 73.6
48% 44.3 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 102
80% 97.5 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 59%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GH-SSDR2SA960 960GB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 32 72 83 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
Read 405
Write 203
Mixed 156
SusWrite 70.6
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 24.5
93% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 10.6
31% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
112GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 170 144 147 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 176
Mixed 77
SusWrite 163
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H370 Performance Builds (Compare 347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock H370 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $568
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback