Biostar TA990FXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TA990FXE  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 21:14
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 78
2-Core 144
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 449
42% 351 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35% Below average
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 54.5
Parallax 65.2
30% 52.2 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 52.3
45% 55.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 198 151 181 123 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 350
Write 338
Mixed 246
SusWrite 182
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 6.4
74% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 39.7
35% 50.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
222GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 103 101 99 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 96.4
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 100
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA990FXE Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TA990FXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $484
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback