Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '20 at 02:46
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 302
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,181
102% 872 Pts
64-Core 1,181
73% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 110
Parallax 189
102% 142 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 116
Splatting 152
106% 126 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1708 1408 1416 1329 1049 892 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,547
Write 1,607
Mixed 1,476
SusWrite 1,300
334% 1,483 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 62.4
127% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 1,687
DQ Write 1,214
DQ Mixed 1,396
1,057% 1432 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 249%
Great: 335%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
179GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 435 429 428 435 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 445
Mixed 454
SusWrite 412
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 38.9
157% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
857GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 90 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64% Good
Read 132
Write 138
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 90.2
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
176GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 93 100 93 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60% Good
Read 110
Write 28
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 97.1
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.4
184% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 29.8
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 26.9
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $780
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback