Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120727
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 19:22
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 107
51% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 280
29% 232 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Lighting 97.1
Reflection 85
Parallax 86.5
79% 89.6 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 73.2
72% 91.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 207 208 200 194 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.7% Good
Read 227
Write 204
Mixed 202
SusWrite 201
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 34.5
115% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 144
108% 144 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 165 174 178 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 118
Write 104
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 172
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
258GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 23.9
Write 26.1
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 25.7
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 104%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 6.7 6.3 5.7 6.2 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 6
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.7
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA785GM-US2H Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback