Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung Samsung DeskTop System  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111216
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 10:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 77
2-Core 151
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 262
38% 278 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Sanyo(144D B081) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 106 143 131 126 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 233
Write 204
Mixed 192
SusWrite 139
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 12.7
58% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 92.1
DQ Mixed 18.3
36% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
913GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 112 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 69
SusWrite 111
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Samsung 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback