Acer Aspire M3870

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M3870 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer ET1861
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091215
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '20 at 08:41
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 115 53% 86 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 180 25% 184 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315 2,008 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 1.12 2% 2.52 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.56 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 228 226 226 228 228 MB/s Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.5% Above average	Read 244 Write 226 Mixed 226 SusWrite 226 52% 230 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 20.5 83% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 47.7 76% 146 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 52GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 55 56 56 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 46.9 Write 49 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 55.7 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 364GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 72 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 102 Write 92.6 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 71.5 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5673EH1-CH9 859B RM51264BA1339.16FD 0702 51264Y133I 80CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 13.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M3870 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3870

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	15x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	6x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GeForce 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,147 samples	4x
GeForce GT 330NvidiaBench 5%, 845 samples	3x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	2x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,517 samples	8x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 859B RM51264BA1339.16FD 0702 51264Y133I 80CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 12GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	2x
99U5474-010.A00LF 0198 99U5474-010.A00LF 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8GBUnknownBench 36%, 10 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16