Asus TUF Gaming FA506IU_FX506IU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FA506IU_FX506IU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IU
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 04:10
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 63.6
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 75.6
40% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 524
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 16CF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 34.6
8% 18.7 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 56.5
35% 39.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 892 914 927 930 927 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 868
Write 925
Mixed 808
SusWrite 914
198% 879 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 43
142% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 399
303% 400 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 153%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 31.6
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FA506IU_FX506IU Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FA506IU_FX506IU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback