Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 02:18
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 280
98% 175 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 776
77% 627 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 150
Parallax 129
110% 138 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 134
Splatting 111
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T2535T480G 480GB
146GB free
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 90 7.1 124 24 8 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 500
Write 424
Mixed 378
SusWrite 112
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 21.4
131% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 24.9
75% 154 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 97%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 261 263 261 258 259 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,974
Write 1,236
Mixed 497
SusWrite 314
221% 1,005 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 59.6
227% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,130
DQ Write 1,057
DQ Mixed 671
619% 953 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 216%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 479 484 488 488 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 491
Mixed 427
SusWrite 481
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 53.3
187% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 124%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
58GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 71 72 71 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 74.8
Write 63
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 72
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 26.4
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 30.1
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 1,076 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback