Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 14:54
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 272
97% 173 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 808
76% 630 Pts
64-Core 806
50% 806 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 151
Parallax 130
112% 139 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 136
Splatting 112
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T2535T480G 480GB
108GB free
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 8.1 307 181 12 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 487
Write 409
Mixed 366
SusWrite 102
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.5
47% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 7.5
DQ Mixed 0.4
17% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 97%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 621 286 285 282 278 275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,949
Write 1,469
Mixed 556
SusWrite 338
238% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 52.3
213% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,059
DQ Write 1,111
DQ Mixed 700
632% 957 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 211%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 482 486 488 492 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 490
Mixed 419
SusWrite 484
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 53.5
186% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 124%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
327GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 109 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 115
Write 102
Mixed 73
SusWrite 109
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 26.5
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 30.8
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 49.7
80% 49.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 1,076 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback