Asus X550WE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550WE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550WE
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 22:55
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Memory 36.3
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 55.4
25% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Asus(1043 17AD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 2.69
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3.04
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 354 356 360 369 365 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 380
Write 368
Mixed 316
SusWrite 355
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 25.1
85% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 148
117% 162 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G Micron MT41K512M8RH-125:E 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550WE Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus X550WE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback