Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H370HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 15:48
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 158
54% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 660
57% 485 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 55.2
51% 65.5 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 65.3
56% 69 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSR250GB 250GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 45 167 61 20 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 483
Write 397
Mixed 340
SusWrite 128
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 1.2
51% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
17% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 90%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
90GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 136 124 112 100 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 438
Write 260
Mixed 305
SusWrite 162
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 18.8
79% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 89.7
DQ Mixed 41.2
48% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 153 153 152 153 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 157
Write 158
Mixed 112
SusWrite 152
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 8.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $586
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback