Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H370HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 15:22
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 816
85% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 81
Parallax 57
34% 60 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 66.3
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSR250GB 250GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 36 117 44 44 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 511
Write 390
Mixed 378
SusWrite 116
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 20.5
116% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 29.2
77% 155 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 90%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
90GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 135 129 118 134 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 451
Write 288
Mixed 249
SusWrite 174
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 18
71% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 40.8
47% 82 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 152 155 153 153 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 113
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 152
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $586
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback