Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 02:46
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 237
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 561
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 27.8
17% 22.1 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 24
Splatting 22.9
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 137 124 96 112 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 416
Write 347
Mixed 301
SusWrite 133
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 5.5
49% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 36.3
44% 78 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 55%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 186 187 185 188 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 202
Write 191
Mixed 103
SusWrite 186
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.8
12% 4.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 23%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
688GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 158 156 157 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 177
Mixed 30
SusWrite 158
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback