Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 06:28
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 247
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 676
71% 567 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 19.5
Parallax 30.5
19% 24.4 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 23.9
18% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 127 136 108 130 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 447
Write 380
Mixed 186
SusWrite 142
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 8.8
65% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 31.8
45% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50%
Great: 55%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 183 188 184 185 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 214
Write 190
Mixed 102
SusWrite 185
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.47 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 23%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
651GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 158 170 167 164 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 165
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 165
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 27.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 23.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback