Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705GM
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	May 28 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 121 2-Core 245 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 567 60% 477 Pts	64-Core 551 34% 551 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1B4E) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Lighting 59.1 Reflection 68.3 Parallax 55.8 48% 61.1 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 55.8 Splatting 65.4 52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB 6,558 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 183 172 172 154 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 1,052 Write 390 Mixed 258 SusWrite 175 102% 469 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 33.5 150% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 201 170% 244 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 129%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 419GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 105 106 106 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 134 Write 138 Mixed 55 SusWrite 106 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.6 253% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 99U5700-013.A00G 16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.9% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 19.8 66% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 20 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	577x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	46x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	324x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	299x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	186x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	110x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	53x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	141x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	119x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16