Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705GM
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '20 at 16:39
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 86.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 240 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 660 73% 573 Pts	64-Core 1,001 62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1B4E) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4587 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	50.8% Above average	Lighting 61.1 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 57.2 50% 62.9 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 57.1 Splatting 65.5 53% 64.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB 6,558 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 175 174 172 169 156 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 1,066 Write 410 Mixed 381 SusWrite 176 111% 508 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 39.2 171% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 223 187% 267 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 129%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 419GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 105 106 106 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 143 Write 139 Mixed 54 SusWrite 106 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.6 242% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 99U5700-013.A00G 16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	81.4% Excellent	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 23 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 35.8 SC Mixed 24.4 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	577x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	46x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	324x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	299x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	186x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	110x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	53x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	141x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	119x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16