MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 04:57
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 310
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,052
99% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,463
90% 1,463 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
MSI(1462 3818) ≥ 4GB; RX 5700 GAMING X
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 98.3
Parallax 201
96% 139 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 109
Splatting 129
93% 112 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
461GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1457 772 774 881 875 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,247
Write 1,833
Mixed 884
SusWrite 860
324% 1,456 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 58.1
218% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 579
DQ Write 1082
DQ Mixed 670
554% 777 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 246%
Great: 372%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB
761GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 73 64 66 72 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 451
Write 457
Mixed 404
SusWrite 69.6
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 34.3
113% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 172
151% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid ST500LM021-1KJ15 500GB
227GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 59 61 62 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
Read 110
Write 89.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 61.8
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 74%
Amd-raid Array 4 10TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 85 78 79 83 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 61
Write 92
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 81.9
59% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.3
286% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 40.2
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 39.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 5,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $367
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback