Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P35-DS3L  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080327
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 00:13
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5450-$299
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 103
49% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 199
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1460 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 23.9
20% 23.1 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 20.3
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 157 181 179 168 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.6% Good
Read 237
Write 182
Mixed 200
SusWrite 171
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 37.3
127% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 161
127% 176 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 86%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 18TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 23
Write 25.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 16.4
16% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.6
282% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 122%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 9TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 95 97 91 99 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 144
Write 99.7
Mixed 76
SusWrite 92.1
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 109%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
847GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 117
Write 106
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 108
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 65%
SD Card Reader 256GB
238GB free, PID 2731
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 23 26 23 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 91
Write 58.7
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 25.1
73% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 4
264% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.3% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P35-DS3L Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback