HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 19:00
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4360-$87
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 183
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 235
36% 262 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 5.03
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 1.66
4% 4.65 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 4.48
4% 5.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 370 351 364 298 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 385
Write 371
Mixed 360
SusWrite 327
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 51.6
161% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 276
231% 334 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
328GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 377 357 369 360 383 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 372
Mixed 356
SusWrite 370
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 49.7
171% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 294
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
553GB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 144 145 146 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 142
Write 145
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 144
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 108%
KINGSTON SV300S37A120G 120GB
25GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 86 89 84 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 106
Mixed 107
SusWrite 86.7
144% 111 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 18.1
1,538% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 25.5
DQ Mixed 17.9
1,542% 20.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 122%
Great: 120%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
49GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 124 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 116
Write 120
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 123
140% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GB
1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback