HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 10:41
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4360-$87
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 248
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 1.38
4% 3.74 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 3.74
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
34GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 166 157 96 131 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 336
Write 199
Mixed 233
SusWrite 146
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 37.8
127% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 208
156% 208 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 87%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
181GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 277 283 303 291 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 380
Mixed 388
SusWrite 282
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 41.7
137% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 276
226% 324 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 123%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 480GB
446GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 118 127 124 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.3
Write 352
SusWrite 125
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 20.4
68% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 112
87% 120 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 71%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 280 286 306 295 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 376
Mixed 373
SusWrite 285
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 41.9
137% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 287
234% 332 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92%
Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
916GB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 116 108 116 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69% Good
Read 130
Write 133
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 111
72% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69%
Great: 108%
KINGSTON SV300S37A120G 120GB
40GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 84 81 84 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 84.7
131% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 14.6
1,302% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 19.4
1,616% 21 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%
KINGSTON SV300S37A120G 120GB
52GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 91 87 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 137
Write 109
Mixed 108
SusWrite 87.7
145% 110 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 18
1,461% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 26.1
DQ Mixed 19.4
1,611% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 114%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
38GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 123 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 125
Write 113
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 123
139% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 12.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback