PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P55-UD3L (all builds) |
Memory | 1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100625 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | May 24 '20 at 07:08 |
Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
Run User | BIH-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.7%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.50
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.5 41 11 MB/s
|
19%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB
83GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 28 27 27 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 73x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 54x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 33x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 19x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 15x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 15x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $212 |