Gigabyte GA-P55-UD3L

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-UD3L (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 07:31
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 77.4 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 127 56% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 336 35% 283 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.6% Above average	Lighting 63.5 Reflection 76.6 Parallax 74.6 52% 71.5 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 70 Splatting 69.2 57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 62 95 91 21 102 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.2% Below average	Read 101 Write 70.3 Mixed 101 SusWrite 82.1 20% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 21.5 79% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 56 DQ Mixed 25.7 24% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 85%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 83GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 27.3 Mixed 16 SusWrite 28.1 34% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 7.4 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-UD3L Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-UD3L

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	73x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	54x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	19x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	15x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
AS-512 512GBBench 71%, 119 samples	8x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	62x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	43x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16