Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP530U3C-A05PL
Memory	7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150722
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	May 23 '20 at 14:15
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	19%
CPU Throttled	47%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225 26,848 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 33.3 27% 36.5 Pts	4-Core 43.9 8-Core 48.3 6% 46.1 Pts	64-Core 49.1 3% 49.1 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 0.91 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 2.48 1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2306RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 233 249 225 242 243 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 387 Write 292 Mixed 199 SusWrite 246 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 12.5 41% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 93.7 DQ Mixed 99.9 76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 99%
Sandisk i100 24GB 942 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1GB free Firmware: 11.56.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 13 14 14 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 320 Write 22 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 14.1 21% 98 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 7.4 24% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 075D GR1600S364L11/8G 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.3% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 9.2 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	95x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	38x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	167x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	16x
GeForce GT620MNvidiaBench 3%, 886 samples	5x

SSD
i100 24GBSandiskBench 28%, 942 samples	20x
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 808 samples	39x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F BA92-09550A 6GBElpidaBench 41%, 139 samples	11x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 276 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16