Samsung 770Z7E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung 770Z7E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP770Z7E-S01DE
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131104
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 09:17
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3635QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 158
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 438
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M200X
Sanyo(144D C0EC) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.15019.1003
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 13
Parallax 16.1
11% 14.3 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 15.6
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
631GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 432 426 426 429 419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 439
Mixed 418
SusWrite 427
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 38.8
124% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 352
268% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 075D GR1600S364L11/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.2% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 770Z7E Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 770Z7E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback