Hp-pavilion WL373AA-ABE HPE-141es

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion WL373AA-ABE HPE-141es (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	May 21 '20 at 13:57
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 75.8 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 106 52% 81.5 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 358 33% 276 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3547) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.62% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 3.53 3% 3.62 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 4 Splatting 2.22 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.62% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 22 95 23 16 66 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42% Average	Read 151 Write 97.2 Mixed 210 SusWrite 40 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 21.5 82% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 61.5 82% 148 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 402GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 123 124 123 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 114 Write 116 Mixed 70.1 SusWrite 123 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 513GB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 27.3 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 2.9 28% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 802GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 478GB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 24 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 30.4 Write 26.6 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 22.9 35% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HP497157-C01-ELDW 4x2GB 252 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 13 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 10.2 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16