Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 56.6 2-Core 113 56% 86.9 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 225 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 104C) 2GB CLim: 1352 MHz, MLim: 1702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20% Poor	Lighting 23 Reflection 21.6 Parallax 28.7 19% 24.4 fps	MRender 30.9 Gravity 27 Splatting 25.5 22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37120G 120GB 965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 27 28 28 MB/s Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.3% Above average	Read 256 Write 225 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 27.8 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 35.7 125% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 74.8 71% 110 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 78%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 629GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 27 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 93 Write 96 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 27.8 54% 73 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 76%
Disk drive 20GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 11GB free Firmware: 3.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 27 28 28 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 21.3 Write 23.3 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 27.6 17% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series00 1866 CL10 Series00 16GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 667, 667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.7% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 12.8 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 9.1 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 960TAMD $469Bench 54%, 4,461 samples	2x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	1x
9905402-669.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 36%, 23 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 3x4GBMicronBench 42%, 163 samples	1x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203