ECS A785GM-AD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS A785GM-AD3 (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '20 at 11:28
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X3 710 965 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Memory 92.1 92% 92.1 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 104C) 2GB CLim: 1302 MHz, MLim: 1777 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Lighting 21.2 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 22 17% 20.6 fps	MRender 30.3 Gravity 26.5 Splatting 24.7 22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Disk drive 120GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 12 11 12 12 11 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37% Below average	Read 221 Write 200 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 12.8 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 23.8 74% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 68.5 DQ Mixed 89.5 67% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 102%
Disk drive 1TB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 486GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 11 12 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 104 Write 105 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 12 57% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 97%
Disk drive 20GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 6GB free Firmware: 3.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 11 12 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 25 Write 11.7 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 11.7 12% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 2x4GB 1,539 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 17 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 14.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.8 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A785GM-AD3 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A785GM-AD3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 960TAMD $469Bench 54%, 4,461 samples	2x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	1x
9905402-669.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 36%, 23 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 3x4GBMicronBench 42%, 163 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16