Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 16:23
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 755
73% 602 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 113
Parallax 105
89% 109 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 100
Splatting 100
81% 99 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 559 563 554 560 561 552 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 672
Write 537
Mixed 451
SusWrite 558
124% 555 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 44.8
161% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 762
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 380
324% 487 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 135%
Great: 243%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
252GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 979 980 984 982 961 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 828
Write 990
Mixed 607
SusWrite 974
192% 850 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 50.3
212% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 668
541% 766 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 193%
Great: 230%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$200
382GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1073 1038 1020 1067 1058 1048 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,006
Write 1,216
Mixed 688
SusWrite 1,051
224% 990 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 56.5
187% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 759
DQ Write 621
DQ Mixed 568
459% 650 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 193%
Great: 237%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$110
236GB free
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 781 775 774 770 766 766 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,309
Write 886
Mixed 669
SusWrite 772
203% 909 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 50.8
175% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 553
462% 673 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 186%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8213.C16FB CT16G4DFD8213.C16FA 32GB
2600, 2600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD3P-CF Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback