Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 15:04
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 231
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 671
69% 558 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 114
Parallax 105
88% 109 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 101
82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 556 563 557 561 561 562 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 656
Write 527
Mixed 428
SusWrite 560
122% 543 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 41.3
150% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 365
314% 474 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 130%
Great: 243%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
252GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 955 961 967 963 962 959 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 836
Write 962
Mixed 630
SusWrite 961
191% 847 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 51.5
212% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 770
578% 771 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 191%
Great: 230%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$200
382GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1044 1050 1051 1048 1039 1057 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1235
Write 1,050
Mixed 678
SusWrite 1048
225% 1,003 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 48.3
166% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 806
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 571
463% 659 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 196%
Great: 237%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$110
236GB free
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 795 780 777 779 780 783 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,364
Write 881
Mixed 582
SusWrite 782
201% 902 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 54.5
173% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 573
DQ Mixed 567
456% 646 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 187%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8213.C16FB CT16G4DFD8213.C16FA 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 22.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 19.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD3P-CF Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback