Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 14:40
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 689
67% 553 Pts
64-Core 897
56% 897 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 109
Parallax 23.3
26% 54.9 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 95
Splatting 32.4
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 535 545 558 544 518 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 663
Write 539
Mixed 431
SusWrite 539
122% 543 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 42.1
157% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 376
319% 479 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 131%
Great: 243%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
252GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 951 947 955 929 927 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 761
Write 997
Mixed 588
SusWrite 940
186% 822 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 43.9
191% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 863
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 784
591% 792 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 181%
Great: 230%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$200
382GB free
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 1032 1040 1058 1049 1040 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,230
Write 1,083
Mixed 691
SusWrite 1,043
227% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 48.3
174% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 592
DQ Mixed 619
485% 676 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 198%
Great: 237%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$110
236GB free
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 782 777 779 775 779 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,269
Write 881
Mixed 625
SusWrite 781
198% 889 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 48.1
172% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 805
DQ Write 588
DQ Mixed 530
441% 641 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 182%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8213.C16FB CT16G4DFD8213.C16FA 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD3P-CF Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback