HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 339A
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1824 x 1014 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '20 at 23:56
Run Duration	394 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 100 2-Core 178 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 373 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 11.2 11% 12.6 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 14.4 11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49 13,478 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 384 411 417 419 422 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 477 Write 420 Mixed 326 SusWrite 390 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 28.4 94% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 207 176% 256 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 108%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB 24,830 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 74GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 225 237 238 238 239 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.5% Good	Read 257 Write 240 Mixed 234 SusWrite 225 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 31.5 104% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 194 148% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 103 103 103 104 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 160 Write 135 Mixed 66 SusWrite 101 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 113%
Liteon UITRA1 1TB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 823GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 23.2 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 18.4 18% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 107%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1TB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 19.5 Write 20.6 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 4.2 22% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.4 134% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 30%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 207GB free, PID 5070 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 21.7 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 4.2 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 28%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 334 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 390GB free, PID 0577 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.49% Terrible	Read 30.6 Write 14.9 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 4.2 21% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.49% Great: 19%
MICRONET FANTOM DRIVE 1TB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 206GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	Read 32.1 Write 22.2 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 4.2 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 23%
ST350063 0A 500GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 62GB free, PID 6204 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	8.76% Terrible	Read 29.8 Write 13.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 4.2 19% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.76% Great: 16%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00A8LB0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 172GB free, PID b159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.2% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 20 Mixed 22 SusWrite 4.3 24% 19 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 14%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 246GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 19.5 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 4.3 23% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 20%
LaCie d2 quadra 1TB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 484GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.48% Terrible	Read 30.4 Write 21.1 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 4.2 24% 19 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.48% Great: 21%
DMI External HDD 1TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 151GB free, PID 0336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	9.85% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 21.5 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 4.2 25% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.85% Great: 21%
Mass Storage Device 2TB 346 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 925GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 16.2 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 16 24% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.5 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 27%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 926GB free, PID d000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.26% Terrible	Read 31 Write 21.2 Mixed 22 SusWrite 4.2 24% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 9.26% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM2L16BC8R2-B0BS 1x8GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	34% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11.4 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	912x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	286x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	204x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	419x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	191x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	129x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	86x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	20x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	20x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16