Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 21 '19 at 10:23
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 271
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 880
86% 704 Pts
64-Core 1254
78% 1254 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 73.9
Reflection 78
Parallax 75.8
60% 75.9 fps
MRender 76.5
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 74.7
61% 74 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 164 161 167 147 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 374
Write 197
Mixed 239
SusWrite 161
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 37.2
130% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 189
142% 192 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
303GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2314 791 792 791 793 793 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2492
Write 2,416
Mixed 1,857
SusWrite 1,046
438% 1,953 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 91.2
307% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,302
DQ Write 1,169
DQ Mixed 1,240
929% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 314%
Great: 355%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
109GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 159 162 156 158 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 140
Write 176
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 161
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 2TB
33GB free, PID 50a5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 15 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Read 36.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 14.3
34% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 60%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
271GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 37
Mixed 27
SusWrite 14.3
38% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 19%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
3TB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 37
Mixed 32
SusWrite 14.2
39% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 34.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 35.2
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback