Asus CM6731_CM6431_CM6331

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CM6731_CM6431_CM6331  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6731_CM6431_CM6331
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '20 at 14:06
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 175
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 354
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 143 52 32 54 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.2% Below average
Read 196
Write 212
Mixed 194
SusWrite 86.6
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 19.5
72% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 5.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
23% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
844GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 178 177 177 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 175
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 177
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 119 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 117
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 04CB EL64C1C1624Z1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6731_CM6431_CM6331 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6731_CM6431_CM6331

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback